China’s Kashmir Policies
by John W. Garver
China has at least six distinct policies toward Kashmir. There is China’s
formal, declaratory position on the issue. There are Chinese demonstrations
of support for Pakistan’s security during periods of India–Pakistan
confrontation over Kashmir. There is Chinese support for Pakistan’s
military and industrial development efforts regardless of India–Pakistan
tension over Kashmir. There is Beijing’s stance regarding the
modalities for solving the Kashmir issue. Finally, Beijing uses Kashmir
as diplomatic leverage with Washington and New Delhi.
The Changing Political Economy of Federalism
in India: A Historical Institutionalist Approach
by Aseema Sinha
India’s economic reform program started in 1991, unleashing a
process of decentralization and competitive race among its regional
states. Yet the
post-reform era in India is marked by both change and continuity in terms
of center–state economic relations. Attention to the path and
process of reform must attend to the reform legacies of the ancien
regime and how
they
are transformed over time. I show that the prereform era was characterized
not by an absence of competition, but by a different type of competition
among states. A historical institutional framework shows that policy change
in India
transforms the existing balance of power, but does so shaped by the preexisting
institutional context and preexisting linkages, resources, and skills. This
approach, allows us to integrate an analysis of pre-1991 policy regime into
evaluations of the post-1991 changes in a more cohesive, realistic, and yet
nuanced manner.
A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment of India
as an Emerging Power
by Dinshaw
Mistry
This article assesses whether India is a great power in the world
system, taking into consideration its nuclear status, its pursuit
of a second generation
of economic reforms, and its improving ties with the United States since
the late 1990s. The article reviews three recent books on the topic, authored
or edited by Stephen Cohen (2001), Sumit Ganguly (2003), and T. V. Paul
and Baldev Raj Nayar (2003). These studies assess Indian power
through its substantial
military and economic capabilities, and also examine India’s relations
with its regional neighbors and with the world’s major countries as
a means to attaining power. The article further assesses national power as
a state’s ability to control international political outcomes and notes
India’s limitations on this dimension of power.