Globalization
and the Politics of International Corporate Taxation: A View From India
by Rahul
Mukherji
Globalization spurred by information and communication technology could
erode the ability of states to tax its corporations. Digitization makes
it easy to penetrate foreign markets without the need for physical
presence in the buyer’s country. This phenomenon has generated
debates on the salience of source versus residence-based taxation,
and, the definition of permanent establishment. There is no multilateral
organization governing international corporate taxation. The paper
notes both the inadequacy of unilateral approaches and the need for
a global approach to setting and monitoring standards. Consistent with
the interests of producer developing countries like India, it commends
the vitality of source-based principles and the traditional conception
of permanent establishment. India’s interests are similar to
those of many capital scarce producer countries exporting their services
over the Internet. Moreover, they are not antithetical to the interests
of capital abundant countries. The issue-area is in dire need of global
governance.
Some
Economic Consequences of India’s Institutions of Governance: A Conceptual
Framework
by Nirvikar
Singh
This paper examines the functioning of some of India’s institutions
of governance, namely, the legislative and executive branches of government,
the judiciary, and the bureaucracy, from an instrumental, economic
perspective. Governance is analyzed along three dimensions: (1) the
degree of commitment or durability of laws and rules, (2) the degree
of enforcement of these laws, and (3) the degree of decentralization
of jurisdictions with respect to local public goods. It is suggested
that India's experience of governance reflects insufficiencies in all
three dimensions: of durability, enforcement, and decentralization,
with adverse consequences for economic efficiency. The paper concludes
with a brief normative discussion of collective action in general,
and alternative structures of institutions of governance.
Failed
Threats and Flawed Fences: India’s Military Responses to Pakistan’s
Proxy War
by Praveen
Swami
In the wake of a terrorist attack on Parliament House in New Delhi
in 2001, India mobilized its armies along its western frontiers,
and threatened to go to war with Pakistan. In the event, India
did not go to war, although none of its key demands – an
end to cross-border terrorism, for example, or the return of twenty
terrorists claimed to be harbored by Pakistan – were met.
This paper examines the backdrop to the military of crisis of 2001-2002,
in particular the long series of war threats made by India in response
to Pakistani sub-conventional warfare in Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir.
It argues that neither war threats nor physical fencing of India’s
frontiers have deterred this sub-conventional warfare, and that
alternate means have to be found to contain it.
Review
Essay: India, China, the United States, Tibet, and the Origins
of the 1962 War
by John
W. Garver
This
article reviews several recent books, including the recently declassified
Indian official history of the 1962 war, and analyzes the possible
role of India complicity with US covert operations in Tibet as a factor
in the origin of the 1962 Sino-Indian war. The Indian official history
of the 1962 war offers little useful information in this regard, while
other scholarly studies are reckless in their assertions of Indian
complicity. We still remain in the dark about
what Nehru knew and when he knew it about CIA activities in Tibet.
The best guess seems to be
that Nehru had a broad, general knowledge of US covert activities,
recognized as useful for pressing China to compromise with India over
Tibet, but refused to associate India in any way with US activities.