Special
Issue on The Politics of India's Next Generation of Economic Reforms
Guest Editors: Rob Jenkins and Sunil Khilnani
Understanding India’s Reform Trajectory:
Past Trends and Future Challenges
by Montek Singh Ahluwalia
This article examines the trajectory of India’s economic reforms – assessing
both past trends and future challenges. It argues that the gradual
nature of reform has been a reflection of the pluralistic character
of India’s politics. Contrary to popular perception, India’s
reforms were not imposed by international financial institutions. The
paper also takes issue with recent research claiming that, because
economic growth in the 1990s was, on average, little better than growth
in the 1980s, therefore the reforms of the 1990s cannot be considered
a hugely consequential development. The author argues that the higher
growth rates of the mid 1990s – of roughly 7.5 percent – could
not have been achieved by simply continuing with the very limited liberalization
of the 1980s. Moreover, sustaining this higher growth trajectory in
the years ahead is feasible if, at a minimum, three issues are addressed:
agricultural reform, infrastructural improvement, and reforms to unlock
the economic potential of poorly performing regions.
Managing Competition: Politics and the Building of Independent Regulatory
Institutions
by Rahul Mukherji
This
essay compares institutional reform in two key infrastructure sectors:
telecommunications and power. While reform
in India’s
telecom sector was relatively successful, the power sector fared much
less well. Why? To be sure, reforming power tariffs presented more
political obstacles than did regulating telecom pricing, but this does
not fully explain the divergent outcomes in the two sectors. This paper
argues that successful reform in the telecom sector resulted from its
reliance on a “homegrown” approach, itself inspired by
ideational changes within the prime minister’s office. This helped
reformers to devise reforms that would attract private-sector investment.
The power sector depended on World Bank ideas to a much greater extent,
making it difficult to instill regulatory confidence among private-sector
actors. The other key variable explaining the differing outcomes was
institutional: whereas India’s constitution confers responsibility
for the power sector to state governments – indeed, state-level
regulators were established alongside their central government counterpart – telecommunications
is almost entirely a central government competence. Thus, facing fewer
coordination problems, telecommunications was a more conducive sector
for institutional reform. The paper concludes by arguing for strengthened,
yet accountable, regulators in both sectors.
Financial Globalization and India’s
Equity Market Reform
by John Echeverri-Gent
Since 1990, India’s equity markets have been transformed from
archaic institutions to, in some respects, exemplars of global best
practice. This essay investigates the role of financial globalization
in shaping these changes. It examines the economic incentives created
by the growth of international capital flows, the political leverage
of international financial institutions, and the impact of international
norms. It argues that international capital flows created relentless
incentives for reform, but also that these incentives do not dictate
specific policy responses. International norms played an important
role both in offering models for specific reforms and in shifting the
rhetorical field of policy discourse in favor of the reformers.
Labor
Policy and the Second Generation of Economic Reform in
India
by Rob Jenkins
This paper advances three inter-linked arguments about
the NDA government’s
performance on labor reform. First, like its predecessors, the NDA
government has continued to “reform by stealth,” facilitating
backdoor policy changes rather than effecting them through overt decision-making.
This has involved, among other things, relying on state-level leaders
in India’s federal system to negotiate awkward political dilemmas.
Second, though the NDA avoided directly reforming core labor legislation,
it nevertheless helped to nudge labor reform from the narrow confines
of elite politics onto the terrain of mass politics – an important
aspect of the transition from first- to second-generation reform. Third,
on the other key indicator of this transition – the building
(or resuscitation) of institutions – there has been little progress.
Indeed, the institutions necessary to manage the transition to a new
labor-relations regime have been actively undermined, not least as
a result of the Machiavellian politics involved in the process of reforming
by stealth.
Ideas and Economic
Reforms in India: The Role of International Migration and the Indian
Diaspora
by Devesh Kapur
Discussions on the economic effects of globalization focus primarily
on the causes and consequences of the increased cross-border flow of
capital, goods and services. This paper highlights a more subtle mechanism
arising from the cross-border flow of human capital – namely, the
flow of ideas. Transmitted directly by policy intellectuals who returned
to India after working or studying outside India, as well by members
of the Indian diaspora that have settled abroad, these ideas have influenced
India’s policy framework. Many of these elites are embedded in
international "epistemic communities" that have become linked
to India’s policymaking process. Patterns of elite migration, combined
with certain features of India’s policymaking process and institutional
environment, have reshaped the economic preferences of elites, with significant
consequences for the trajectory of economic reforms. This is a dynamic
that is as likely to increase as to abate as the reform process continues.
Enterprise and Development In India: An Inter-regional Perspective
by Sanjaya Baru
India over the past century has been characterized by sharp inter-regional
variation, with western, north-western and southern India recording
higher rates of growth than eastern, central, north-central and
north-eastern India. Explanations for this have focused on regional
variations
in the
agrarian economy dating to the colonial period. After independence,
planning and fiscal policy were deployed to rectify regional disparities,
but
have not fared well. During the 1990s, while some middle-income
states have been able to improve their position, the backward
regions have
yet to move to a higher growth trajectory. This paper argues that
public investment can, in fact, accelerate economic development
in backward
regions, but only when the pre-conditions for private enterprise
development already exist. Regions that have not made the transition
to agrarian
capitalism are unlikely to urbanize and industrialize. Worse, a
century of backwardness can engender inertia and despair. This
remains an
important challenge for the future of India’s economic reforms.
The
Growth and Sectoral Composition of India’s Middle Class: Its
Impact on the Politics of Economic Liberalization
by E. Sridharan
India's class structure has changed substantially between the
pre-1980 and post-1980 periods. During 1950-80, there were
essentially two
main groups: a tiny elite and large impoverished mass. A more
differentiated and complex pattern – in which the elite and mass components were
supplemented with a substantial middle class – characterized the
1980-2004 period. The paper argues that this layered and sectorally differentiated
middle class has a complicated relationship with economic liberalization.
Despite popular impressions, the middle class remains dominated by public-sector
employees and state-subsidized farmers seeking to derive the benefits
(but avoid the costs) of liberalization. This tension, combined with
the growth and rising self-confidence of the middle class, is part of
the explanation for the sustained but gradual liberalization since 1991.
The paper also briefly examines the complex relationship between the
upper-caste-dominated middle class and the growth of the BJP during this
period.